Airport cartels case shows that technology exists thats criminal

At Southwark Crown Court today a case against British Airways individuals for price fixing with Virgin Atlantic collapsed because the state concerned (The UK Crown) couldn't or didn't submit all of its evidence to the defendants.

Does this suggest that the evidence was based onintercept evidence of 'group-phone calls' that were intercepted not being used in court as it was ruled inadmissable and if so, what does that say about the state of the UK telecommunications industry? Is it already open to interception by non state agencies that are unlicensed sucha s foreign journalists or is it the case that teh state can act or tries to act above the law?

do some firms aid or hinder your own employment?

Taking the Telelbilling example I you can see that each firm or number that is called charges slightly more for less talk time and the callers voice alters. This could be either infiltration by organsied crime or regulation of far more unsulubrious methods of collection that existed in prior to that. This again shows impact into the democratic process and under statutory regulation so the question it poses is therefore are there procedurse in place for the regulation of the semi criminal end of prostitution.

How this impacts on the Common Law and European right to emplyment and not getting hearsay evidence against you leading to dismissal is of note.