Why David Cameron is right about legislation being needed to regulate the internet.




1) Since the 1970s there have been explicit cartoons coming out of East Asia, more recently they have spoofed many childrens cartoon series such as the Simpsons.

2) More extreme varieties are on credit card websites with also posted videos

3) The old ways in which cadets and charities funded themselves with calendars are now becoming perceived as sexist. Plus the purchase of magazines andtheir regulation are now out dated technologically. Put simply there isn’t the money in it or the business of Peter Stringfellow et. al.

4) A Hillingdon council house or shared ownership could not be supported by modelling for these magazines and starring in the amateur pornos made at the same time, let alone starting a family. One series has more underage at times and the other has extreme content. Whether the models are really 18 is open to question. To paraphrase the NSPCC, these ‘publications’ breach the underwear rule.

5) These products could put their models in danger in Muslim countries as a breach of Shariah Law.

6) Some adult dating sites could contain the content and email it to people of older ages the ‘bit.ly’ server in particular.

7) No classroom and internet can be 100% supervised and hacking the protocols to have a look is a technical challenge that many students, being more savvy in the updates in computer programming than their teachers, could theoretically achieve.

8) Hence software licencing and support should be by borough or district council so that there is ongoing technical update support for schools and liason with social services (provided that they do not produce such magazines).